When It’s Value Stocks vs Growth Stocks, History Is on Value’s Side

Historical Evidence of Value Stocks Outperforming Growth Stocks

When evaluating value stocks versus growth stocks, historical evidence consistently shows that value stocks tend to outperform growth stocks over the long term. This assertion is grounded in both logic and extensive data, providing a clear guide for investors seeking higher potential returns.

Data spanning nearly a century in the US, and almost five decades of market data outside the US, affirm that value stocks—those with lower relative prices—have higher expected returns. This long-term data supports the positive expected value premium, a crucial factor for investors aiming to maximize their returns.

In recent years, growth stocks have experienced a notable period of outperformance compared to their value counterparts. Despite these short-term fluctuations, the fundamental principle that stocks with lower relative prices lead to higher expected returns remains unchanged.

Long-Term Performance Analysis

On average, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks by 4.54% annually in the US since 1928, as illustrated in Exhibit 1. This significant outperformance highlights the potential advantages of investing in value stocks over the long term.

To delve deeper into this comparison over the specific period in question, we observe that in 1993, growth stocks had a total return of 1.68%, while value stocks returned 18.61%. This trend of fluctuating performances continues through the years, with growth stocks seeing a significant increase in 1995 with a return of 38.13%, closely followed by value stocks at 36.99%.

However, the early 2000s saw a reversal with growth stocks experiencing negative returns in 2000 and 2001, at -22.08% and -12.73% respectively, compared to the more resilient value stocks at 6.08% and -11.71% for the same years. The financial crisis of 2008 further highlights the volatility, with growth stocks dropping to -34.91% and value stocks to -39.22%. The recovery period post-crisis again shows competitive returns, with growth stocks rebounding to 31.60% in 2009 and value stocks to 21.18%.

The pattern continues into the recent decade where, in 2020, growth stocks significantly outpaced value stocks with a return of 33.47% compared to 1.37% for value stocks. However, by 2022, both categories of stocks faced declines, with growth stocks at -29.41% and value stocks at -5.22%. This detailed year-by-year analysis not only corroborates the historical average advantage of value stocks over growth stocks since 1928 but also underscores the yearly variability and the influence of broader economic conditions on the performance of these two categories of stocks.

Putting Recent Performance in Perspective

Historical context is essential when analyzing the recent outperformance of growth stocks. Exhibit 1 shows that realized premiums are highly volatile, and periods of underperformance, while disappointing, fall within the expected range of outcomes.

Investors should remember that while short-term trends can be unpredictable, the historical evidence supporting the outperformance of value stocks remains robust.


Exhibit 1: Historical Performance of Value Stocks vs. Growth Stocks

 

value stocks Vs growth stocks
Exhibit 1 – Value Add

Are They Better Together?

1. What is the theoretical advantage of a combined investment approach?The theoretical advantage of combining growth and value stocks is the potential to smooth out the volatility of returns over time, offering a more stable and potentially less risky investment path.

2. How does combining these stocks or funds help across different economic cycles?
This strategy is beneficial across various economic cycles as it allows investors to capitalize on market conditions that favor either growth or value styles, helping to stabilize returns over time.
 
3. What is the potential benefit of combining growth and value stocks or funds?
Combining growth and value stocks or funds can offer investors a potential for higher returns while mitigating risk.
 

Conclusion

Understanding the historical performance of value stocks versus growth stocks can provide valuable insights for investors. While growth stocks may outperform in certain periods, the long-term data supports the consistent outperformance of value stocks. Investors aiming for higher potential returns should consider the enduring advantages of value stocks, even during periods of growth stock outperformance.

By focusing on the long-term benefits and staying informed about historical trends, investors can make more strategic decisions that align with their financial goals.

Why can’t prior results predict future outcomes? Financial markets are shaped by countless changing factors—economic shifts, geopolitical events, and investor behavior all play a role. What worked yesterday may not work tomorrow, and every investment carries a degree of uncertainty and risk of loss. It’s important to remember that even widely cited benchmarks, such as the S&P 500 or Dow JOnes Industrial Average, are subject to swings and do not guarantee profitable returns in the future. No investment strategy is immune to market volatility or unforeseen events, so careful consideration and risk awareness remain essential.

For more insights on value and growth stocks and to explore investment strategies that can maximize your returns, contact us today.


About the Author Douglas Finley, MS, CPWA, CFP, AEP, CDFA

Douglas Finley, MS, CFP, AEP, CDFA founded Finley Wealth Advisors in February of 2006, as a Fiduciary Fee-Only Registered Investment Advisor, with the goal of creating a firm that eliminated the conflicts of interest inherent in the financial planner – advisor/client relationship. The firm specializes in wealth management for the middle-class millionaire.

follow me on:
>